difference between "write a blog post" and "write a page"

rated by 0 users
Answered (Verified) This post has 2 verified answers | 5 Replies | 4 Followers

Not Ranked
7 Posts
Points 125
kleinma posted on Tue, Jul 1 2008 3:17 PM

What is the difference between these 2 options under the blog management when I go to make a new blog post?

 

There is no explaination as to what is different, and from looks alone, they seem identical.

  • | Post Points: 50

Answered (Verified) Verified Answers

Top 150 Contributor
156 Posts
Points 2,385
Answered (Verified) jmbledsoe replied on Mon, Jul 14 2008 1:57 PM
Verified by kleinma

I think that conceptually, posts are for date-driven content, whereas pages are for more "timeless" content.  So news, personal journal entries, bleeding-edge product stuff makes more sense as posts.  Static pages about the blog or author, maybe white papers, and other timeless content makes more sense in pages.

There are a couple more specific differences that I'm aware of:

  1. URLs: Posts have URLs that are date-based.  Pages have URLs that include no date.
  2. Archives: Posts show up in the blog archives whereas pages do not show up in archives.

That's what I could find.  I'm interested to hear if there are other specific differences.

John Bledsoe

Sr. Software Specialist - ATGi

Top 25 Contributor
856 Posts
Points 13,265

There are only two differences between a post and a page.  Pages are not included in syndication feeds and the URLs are slightly different, but that's it.  So, the only reason to use them is if you want a post to not be syndicated.  For example, you might use them for pricing sheets as it's a good idea to keep a history and not just overwrite a page with new prices (a very bad idea).

  • | Post Points: 20

All Replies

Not Ranked
13 Posts
Points 150

I'm a little foggy on this myself, but if I understood what I read correctly a page doesn't feed to RSS and a post does or something like that.  Other than that I don't know.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
156 Posts
Points 2,385
Answered (Verified) jmbledsoe replied on Mon, Jul 14 2008 1:57 PM
Verified by kleinma

I think that conceptually, posts are for date-driven content, whereas pages are for more "timeless" content.  So news, personal journal entries, bleeding-edge product stuff makes more sense as posts.  Static pages about the blog or author, maybe white papers, and other timeless content makes more sense in pages.

There are a couple more specific differences that I'm aware of:

  1. URLs: Posts have URLs that are date-based.  Pages have URLs that include no date.
  2. Archives: Posts show up in the blog archives whereas pages do not show up in archives.

That's what I could find.  I'm interested to hear if there are other specific differences.

John Bledsoe

Sr. Software Specialist - ATGi

Not Ranked
24 Posts
Points 285
ibn replied on Mon, Jul 14 2008 9:08 PM

I didnlt know the diff before reading this. thanks, a lot.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
856 Posts
Points 13,265

There are only two differences between a post and a page.  Pages are not included in syndication feeds and the URLs are slightly different, but that's it.  So, the only reason to use them is if you want a post to not be syndicated.  For example, you might use them for pricing sheets as it's a good idea to keep a history and not just overwrite a page with new prices (a very bad idea).

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Female
1 Posts
Points 5

Thanks for clearing that up.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems

Copyright© 2008 Telligent Systems Inc. All rights reserved
CommunityServer.com  •  Telligent.com