SettingsID

rated by 0 users
Answered (Verified) This post has 2 verified answers | 4 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 25 Contributor
856 Posts
Points 13,265
Bill Bosacker posted on Wed, Mar 12 2008 5:42 PM

Since virtualization has been removed, I was wondering if you are going to remove SettingsID from everything as well?  It would make sense to, as it was only there for virtualization and now has no function.

  • | Post Points: 20

Answered (Verified) Verified Answers

Top 150 Contributor
167 Posts
Points 2,485
CS Developers
Answered (Verified) dpenton replied on Wed, Mar 26 2008 5:51 PM

 Bill,

The @SettingsID value touches a fairly large surface area of our code (as you well know).  We opted to not do it for Community Server 2008, but will do it in a point release afterwards.  There is more to it of course than just removing it (index analysis, query plan analysis, etc) so we wanted to do this in steps.

Thanks,
David L. Penton

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
167 Posts
Points 2,485
CS Developers
Answered (Verified) dpenton replied on Thu, Mar 27 2008 9:34 AM

 Bill,

Treat it as depreciated.  We will be removing it from the tables, likely in the next release (service pack/point release) of Community Server.  We want to do it in such a way that is easy for client of all size databases.

Thanks,
David

 

  • | Post Points: 20

All Replies

Top 150 Contributor
167 Posts
Points 2,485
CS Developers
Answered (Verified) dpenton replied on Wed, Mar 26 2008 5:51 PM

 Bill,

The @SettingsID value touches a fairly large surface area of our code (as you well know).  We opted to not do it for Community Server 2008, but will do it in a point release afterwards.  There is more to it of course than just removing it (index analysis, query plan analysis, etc) so we wanted to do this in steps.

Thanks,
David L. Penton

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
856 Posts
Points 13,265

That's cool.  I guess my biggest question is, do we need to support/use it when CS2008 is released?  Or, will it just be hanging there unused and not required?  Or will it be a combination of the two?  Just curious for the controls that I need to rebuild once the SDK is released.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
167 Posts
Points 2,485
CS Developers
Answered (Verified) dpenton replied on Thu, Mar 27 2008 9:34 AM

 Bill,

Treat it as depreciated.  We will be removing it from the tables, likely in the next release (service pack/point release) of Community Server.  We want to do it in such a way that is easy for client of all size databases.

Thanks,
David

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
856 Posts
Points 13,265

Cool, one less thing to worry about.  Wink

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems

Copyright© 2008 Telligent Systems Inc. All rights reserved
CommunityServer.com  •  Telligent.com